Even in this season of good will and cheer we've all experienced it. You're driving along minding your business when suddenly someone makes a dumb, dangerous maneuver with their car, cutting you off and almost driving you off the road. Then, just for good measure, they give you that universal hand-gesture.
What should be done with people like that?
It's not widely known these days, but here in New England at one time “bad manners” were equated with “bad morals” and as such, colonial authorities, backed by stern church leaders, were harsh with those who exhibited bad morals or manners. I assume that dumb, dangerous driving and lewd hand-gestures would be considered by our colonial ancestors to be “bad manners.”
Just how harshly were offenders treated? In those disciplined times offenders were punished by being placed in public pillories or stocks, and then their friendly neighbors came by and ridiculed them. Some particularly ill-mannered people were branded with red-hot irons and some underwent public whippings. In fact, because of these punishments many people in Puritan Massachusetts fled Maine just to avoid such penalties. I know, you're thinking that might explain some of the manners you see some Mainers exhibiting in public these days. They’re all supposed to be in Massachusetts. In Colonial times people would be hauled before the authorities and punished for disobeying laws involving dress, cursing, scandal-mongering, lying, name-calling and flirting –even making ugly faces could get you pilloried. It doesn't mention it in the history books but I'm sure that making offensive hand gestures was on some Puritan's list of ill-mannered things such as “unacceptable uses of the hand and finger.”
Can you imagine how busy authorities would be these days if they punished bad manners? If they punished only a fraction of those caught cursing, scandal-mongering, lying or name-calling they would need quite a crew of carpenters working almost non-stop just to supply the pillories and stocks.
Imagine if they only enforced laws regarding manners of just those in politics. Why, the New Hampshire primary as we know it would cease to exist. All the politicians and their staffs would be pilloried on an hourly basis.
Around the time our nation was being formed such leaders as George Washington and Ben Franklin took the time to draw up elaborate codes of good behavior. Can you imagine our leaders getting involved in such projects today?
If we were to go back to such harsh punishments, I think we should only use them for real serious offenses, like getting in a 14-items or less express lane with more than the allowed 14 items. Wouldn't you just like to drag those people out to the public square and put them in stocks for a few hours? You could list their grave offense on a sign next to the stock: "Knowingly and willingly got into a supermarket express lane with WAY more than 14 items."
Or, how about punishing people who bring their cell phone to the movies or the theater and leave them on just so everyone can hear their shrill ring-tone when it goes off during a crucial scene? How about people who intentionally take up two parking spaces in a crowded parking lot?
Branding and public whippings might be too harsh for our 21st century sensibilities, but I think pillories and stocks might be just what we need to teach some people around here some manners.